Hellow guys, Welcome to my website, and you are watching Vienna Game: Zhuravlev Countergambit | ROOK vs BISHOP! 🦒♟️😜. and this vIdeo is uploaded by Adventures of a Chess Noob at 2024-04-04T12:00:06-07:00. We are pramote this video only for entertainment and educational perpose only. So, I hop you like our website.
| Name | Vienna Game: Zhuravlev Countergambit | ROOK vs BISHOP! 🦒♟️😜 |
| Video Uploader | Video From Adventures of a Chess Noob |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 04-04-2024 15:00:06 |
| Video Discription | #chess #viennagame #zhuravlevcountergambit #chessbriliancy #giraffeattack ➡️ Support the channel by buying official "Adventures of a Chess Noob" merch at https://chessnoob64.com ➡️ Buy my book "50+2 Chess Quick Wins: Tactical ideas for exciting chess for beginner players"! US: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CJ3VVW9M UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0CJ3VVW9M AU: https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B0CJ44YJ2M ➡️ Blog for full articles and PGN: https://adventuresofachessnoob.com/?p=2979 In the standard way of assigning relative value to pieces, the rook is ascribed a value of 5 pawn-equivalents, substantially more than the 3 pawn-equivalents of the bishop. And it is certainly true as a heuristic that it's usually better to have a rook than a bishop, if it came to a choice in a game. However, what is true as a generality, is not necessarily true in a specific position! In some settings, we understand this implicitly and intuitively; a pawn that is about to promote in an endgame will often be worth more than any piece other than the king. In other settings, this notion can be a more subtle idea, with the relative value of a piece dependent on mobility, and how "difficult" it may be to coordinate the pieces. The "difficulty" of a position to human minds is not something that is easy to quantify, especially with computer analysis. This takes judgement and reflection when using engine-aided analysis; for instance, considering the number of "good moves" vs "bad moves" in a position, how intuitive the good/bad moves are, and the impact of a mistake. In the latter half of this game, I started with an inferior position according to the engine, with a bishop and a rook vs my opponent's rook pair. One would often think that the rook pair should be winning! However, as we shall see, the bishop can have advantages with the greater aggregate mobility of the pieces, while rooks can be awkward to manoeuvre when there are still many pawns on the board. The big takeaway from this game is to not assume that you’ve lost if the piece balance is such that you have a bishop, while your opponent has a rook. A bishop can sometimes be better than a rook, especially when there's still a lot of pieces on the board! Game: https://www.chess.com/game/live/105843003661 |
| Category | Gaming |
| Tags | chess | chess.com | chess noob | chessnoob | vitualis the chess noob | vienna game | vienna game zhuravlev countergambit | zhuravlev countergambit | vienna game giraffe attack | chess brilliancy | brilliant move chess | chess brilliant move | chess tactics | chess strategy | chess opening tactics | chess middlegame tactics | chess middlegame strategy | chess endgame | chess endgame tactics | chess endgame strategy | bishops vs rooks | best youtube chess channel | best chess channel |
